by John Galt » Mon Sep 19, 2016 3:15 pm
the court ruled 4-2 against the prosecutors. those same people have argued that 2 (not 4, but 2) of the judges should have recused themselves from saying that the campaign finance laws in wisconsin are vague and unconstitutional because they were reelected, basically. they didn't recuse themselves because the groups that supported them had no reason to think they would be brought to court, so they werent doing it to buy themselves out of jail. they were doing it to get unamerican laws thrown out -- like laws about campaign finance reform. basically what you suggest is the laws surrounding finance in election can never be overturned unless the judges no longer stand for reelection
Americans learn only from catastrophe and not from experience. -- Theodore Roosevelt
My life has become a single, ongoing revelation that I haven’t been cynical enough.