by Spider » Mon Oct 02, 2017 12:54 pm
Of course it's satire.
So much of this is about language. I'm reading articles right now about the shooter's "machine guns" because these journalists simply don't have the foggiest idea what they're talking about, as usual. Bump fire is something they are reading about on wikipedia at this very moment and desperately trying to even comprehend. The usual suspects (including Clinton) are already piling on talking bans and such. Even using that word completely shuts down the entire conversation before anything else can even be said, as you say.
It's just that compromise along with moderation or centrism are ideas that seem to trigger a lot of unrealistic ideologues from either side.