by John Galt » Thu Mar 22, 2018 2:29 pm
no, i don't propose such.
here's the deal though. that guy will never leave his confinement. he'll live out his days jerking off to porn and playing video games paid for by the people of Norway. so "rehabilitation" is not an option. if it's not an option, why should he go so unpunished? some people deserve to die, which is why it delegitimatizes the Norwegian government that he is allowed to live. it's morally repugnant that such a creature is living a life of comfort when he killed like 80 people. so talking about how Norway reduces recidivism when talking about this is meaningless. and when talking about it in general -- as you did (you said "Norway has a functioning justice system that results in quantitatively less crime, as a result of reduced recidivism") -- is worthless in general anyway because frankly norway has a higher crime rate than the US which focuses on punishment rather than rehabilitation
we all know the moral of lord of the rings: allowing some wretched murderer to live and then sparing him out of pity can cause tremendous pain, suffering, and death of innocents as well as potentially destroy civilization. this is the same thing here. the man deserves to die
Americans learn only from catastrophe and not from experience. -- Theodore Roosevelt
My life has become a single, ongoing revelation that I haven’t been cynical enough.