I was referring to Islam. Welcoming with open arms and little vetting massive numbers of people from war torn nations (with questionable cultural results in the first place) is a gamble. This is not especially controversial, as much as it may offend modern liberals for whom worship of Islam is a sacred cow.
As for my bigotry, etc., I have assisted literally dozens of muslims gain asylum in the U.S. I do not want to stop granting asylym. I like our system and want to keep it how it is, but for improvements in speed, processing times, appeals, and the crapshoot nature of hearings. Some officers grant asylum 90% of the time, some 10%. That is not justice. I do not wish to shut our borders. I also do not wish to wave in every person who wants to come nor let in enough people from fundamentally different belief structures to change what it means to have American beliefs and be American.
My desire to guide the ideology of my country in a positive direction includes curating who joins and how many. Again, this is not controversial for a thinking man. We are a sum of our parts. Think it over a little and consider whether you want to stick with labels that suppress debate or have a discussion about the merits of combining dissimilar cultures abruptly. It has a lot of issues, despite what liberals will tell you. Focus on reality and not on what we want reality to be.