Hillary once again confirms she is a moron...

[Saz]

Two non-responsive posts to what are several valid claims about why the border should be secured. Again, emphasising that dems have absolutely NO PLAN here. You think its not an issue and it will just go away, but you got wrecked by an incompetent amateur in large part because you ignored this issue for so long. And you will do it again, and comprehensive immigration reform will never arrive, and you will throw up your hands and blame republicans when it was dems who inexplicably pushed back on every border security initiative despite pretending they have no issue with basic immigration and border laws.

Trump will again run on building the wall and he will again win. And dems will be clueless. Probably about time to give up on them soon, not a serious party at this point.

[exploited]

Here is the thing: you get the quality you give. And I'll be real with you, the posts you've made here are borderline retarded. You are contradicting yourself not only within the span of a few posts, but often within the span of a few paragraphs. You've spent the last several pages arguing against points never made. And the only factual claim you've attempted to make was really nothing but a chance to talk about your travels and how you are basically the Anthony Bourdain of immigration policy.

I mean at one point, you referenced the first safe country agreement, which Mexico hasn't signed, as the legal justification for not hearing asylum claims. No mention whatsoever that Congress has already authorized a cap on asylum claims. Or that this cap has decreased the number of refugees to the lowest point in seventy years. Or that Mexican migration is way down. Or that the US has been deporting millions. Or that it has dramatically increased border security under every Presidency of the past thirty years.

And yet here you are ranting about nothing being done. It is downright farcical. Can you let this thread proceed without your uninformed, needlessly aggressive hot garbage spewing everywhere?

[Kane]

[Saz]

[Saz]

[exploited]

I'm going to begin by pointing out that your response to Kane is premised on a falsehood. "The wall" is not supported by the majority of Americans. In fact, it is overwhelmingly opposed by Democrats and Independents, with approximately 20% of Republicans in opposition as well.

CBS News. October 14-17, 2018. "Do you favour or oppose building a wall along the U.S.-Mexico border to try to stop illegal immigration?"

Republicans - 76% support, 19% oppose
Democrats - 9% support, 89% oppose
Independents - 34% support, 62% oppose

Total - 60% opposed, 37% in favour, 3% unsure or no answer.

Qunnipiac University. August 9-13, 2018. "Do you support or oppose building a wall along the border with Mexico?"

Support - 38%
Oppose - 58%

Pew Research Center. June 5-12, 2018. "As you may know, there is a proposal to substantially expand the wall along the U.S. border with Mexico. In general, do you favour or oppose this proposal?"

Favour: 40%
Oppose: 56%

Monmouth University. January 28-30, 2018. "Do you favour or oppose building a wall along the U.S. border with Mexico?"

Favour: 40%
Oppose: 57%

ABC News/Washington Post. January 15-18, 2018. "Do you support or oppose building a wall along the U.S. border with Mexico?

Support: 34%
Oppose: 63%

[NAB]

Since Saz is the Anthony Bourdain of asylum law, I think it behooves me to warn him about the danger posed by illegal caravan ropes hiding behind closet doors.

[spacemonkey]

[Saz]

[Saz]