by exploited » Wed Mar 16, 2022 12:11 pm
These are all really high quality copypastas, though that is the only value they provide.
"Nation states perform better when subject to external competition" isn't some grand insight that requires Chinese or American citizenship to comprehend.
The problem isn't the various vague, loose generalizations you've put forward. For instance, saying that increased aggregate GDP is related to population growth isn't controversial, or incorrect. It is just without real meaning when the next logical statement is that military prowess and diplomatic power is determined by population.
It is sloppy, juvenile thinking.
China has had proportionally far greater population than any Western power for centuries. And yet it wasn't until lately that they became great. The UK and the US both were at the peak of their military and diplomatic power without being even CLOSE to the population of China or India. Hell, Germany was very close to kicking the shit out of Europe AND the United States with only half the population of just the US!
Further, why has China become great? Due to the productivity gains and technological advancements created and provided by the West, in order to ship products to... the West! The military equipment they use is stolen wholesale from Russia and the US, both nations with a fraction of their population.
Essentially, saying population is the only true asset of a nation state is one of the most idiotic things ever written on this board.
Now, here is the big piece: this is only one of the full retard things you've said. Just a single one. I am not willing to go through each of your posts to show definitively that what you are saying is vague babies-first-political-insight stuff used as a foundation for a mountain of slobbery retardation. I just don't have the time or the inclination. But I'm genuinely shocked that a smart guy like Galt would not realize what is occurring here.