by G5000 » Mon Dec 03, 2012 2:21 pm
I believe the merits of the fraud case rest on the fact the "counselors" were not qualified to "help" in any way whatsoever. They were not qualified medical people at all.
If a guy on the street says he can "help" you with your mother issues and claims to be an expert in the field, and it turns out he got his education from the back of a cereal box, that is fraud.
And that is what this is.
If these guys were qualified experts in counsleing, then the kids would have a malpractice case.
.
.
We have so many people who can't see a fat man standing beside a thin one without coming to the conclusion the fat man got that way by taking advantage of the thin one. - Ronald Reagan
- These users thanked the author G5000 for the post:
- The Dharma Bum