by broken robot » Mon Dec 03, 2012 12:56 am
Ok, not sure how that's "funny" or how you're playing off my previous post--your bait attempt is still muddled--but basically none of that contradicts what I said earlier which is in the Western countries it's not taboo to draw pictures of the Prophet Muhammad. South Park's not being witty and subversive--meaning, critiquing the norms of its own culture--unless you believe mainstream public opinion in the Western countries is citing religious tolerance or whatever as a defense of death threats against writers and artists.
It's not an interesting point to say here "You shouldn't physically threaten or kill people over drawings of the Prophet Muhammad." That's not a controversial statement. So making light of "Muslim rage" as South Park attempts to do is again a weak excuse for humor and simply reinforces our own ambiguous, historically decontextualized notions that "THEY" are barbarous and "WE" are civilized. It's playing up, not subverting, the dominant processes of racial othering in our culture, just like any non-satirical use of stereotypes.
The argument "haha, it's funny just because it's offensive to someone" isn't an good analysis of humor, it's too often a lazy justification for people anxious to preserve their self-righteous sense of power and entitlement. Yeah, f**k the world. WE'RE AMERICANS!
This is probably for a different topic so assuming Galt has a retort mods can split this thread and I'll discuss it elsewhere.
The Subversives