by Hyperion » Thu Dec 06, 2012 10:30 am
That's your opinion, and it's been consistently asserted, but what's the evidence?
I'm interested in the demographics of the future, not people who will die out in 20 years. How are young more women confronting more problems than young men when almost all sociological indicators point to the opposite?
Feminism as a movement to empower women is increasingly irrelevant in a world where women are taking over the pedestal of power. I'm not talking about sharing power, but instead actually holding power at the expense of men's livelihood. Women were never really a "minority." Patriarchy (if we're going to call it that) wasn't as violent as the oppression religious, ethnic, and sexual minorities faced. The fact feminists even try to compare their plight to the plight of blacks is sickening. Your notion of history is highly skewed if you're trying to compare slavery to the position women served in traditional society. "Patriarchy" developed because of economic necessity: as we became dependent on agriculture, seasonal work (and protecting private property) placed a larger emphasis on the male. Women are pretty much vulnerable during the second and third trimester of pregnancy, and they couldn't contribute to economical success as much since gathering became a trivial hobby at best. This eventually developed into general gender roles. It wasn't men beating their wives over the head with clubs. The fact you even hinted at the "thoughtless caveman" stereotype shows how feminism has indoctrinated you to be prejudiced against your own gender.
I dispute the notion of "patriarchy" anyway. Other than war-torn societies, it's more appropriate to label classical society as dependent on gender roles. Women were not treated like children or even property. Their care was considered to be the man's primary responsibility. Indeed, during many periods in European history if your wife committed a crime, the husband was held responsible.