by The Dude » Tue Dec 11, 2012 1:18 am
well, lesbians are hawt.
Seriously though, dudes not being able to get pregnant still isn't an argument for excluding them from marriage. It's an argument for...f**k, I don't even know what it's an argument for.
I guess the better phrasing of the question is:
What's the purpose of excluding homosexuals from marriage?
I mean, I can give a purpose for separate sex bathrooms, women fighting in the military, affirmative action, etc. Maybe those purposes are wrong but at least they're directly related. I don't see what is accomplished by excluding homosexuals from marriage.