there is no force of the agenda. you don't have to buy the vanity plate. even so, both "license plates" and "abortion" are issues for the state and the feds should have no say in either. i really don't know why the feds are saying anything in this case. violates the first amendment? how? this is saying that not having any plate any one person wishes "violates the first amendment" which as entirely retarded argument. how is this guy a judge
the legislature rejected it because they were the majority and they didn't like it, likely because the people of that state elected a legislature that fits their views which happens to be that babies shouldn't be murdered. so what? i don't see how it's rejection this means the other one should be revoked (used the correct term there)