Do you think that they could hire people? Or is that impossible?
Labeling something isn't super effective argumentation. But sure, label me un-American. No sweat off my back.
And arguably this would be entirely consistent with some version of the Second Amendment. Part of the rationale was because they lacked a standing army and this a "well-regulated militia" was needed to defend from foreign threats, as well as domestic threats such as tyranny. Thus at least 1/2 of the justification if the second amendment has been removed, as we now have a rather impressive standing army.
There is of course the justification of preventing tyranny, which still remains, and is a decent argument. That's a chance I'm willing to take though given theme chance of armed revolt and the direct, immediate, present danger posed by the incredible number of guns in this nation.