Things We Can Agree On: Gun Control

[eric]

I voted in the poll just so I could see if the most ridiculous answer had the most votes...

and of course it did.

Restricting ammo capacity just means somebody carries more magazines. You're an idiot if you think that's a possible solution. Period.

[lnrw]

[Spider]

Wait a few more years for 3D printers to get more mainstream. Then you have any size magazine you want. (not that it matters)

[exploited]

[JDHURF]

I voted for everything except heavier security (armed guards in public places) and no restrictions whatsoever (more guns equals less crime).

I'm pretty shocked to see people arguing against mandatory firearms training. What could possibly be the argument? People have to to take a written and driving test to obtain a driving license.

[Spider]

I think people are arguing against the expense. Though, considering how much more deadly the roads are, I'd not call attention to DMV testing!

[exploited]

[The Dharma Bum]

How is mandatory fire arms training going to help?

[JDHURF]

Having a right denotes having responsibilities. Having the right to own lethal killing machines, many of which were explicitly designed to more efficiently destroy human life, means having serious responsibilities. One of those main responsibilities would clearly be having sufficient training in the safe use of those lethal weapons.

[JDHURF]