by John Galt » Wed Jan 23, 2013 4:19 pm
i'm not in the military but a lot of my family is or has been recently. none of them have ever thought it was anything other than a bad idea, including the women who were in the military
and i still don't think we can undo millions of years of adaptation aka evolution by forcing a change.
there are other problems. women throw roughly 40% as far as men can throw. horseshoes and hand grenades, as they say, is good enough for almost. but 40% of the distance isn't almost, it's actually almost close to you (i read it's something like 45% of female marines can throw a hand grenade a safe distance from themselves, but to be honest, i can't find an ultimate source when googling that). it's also indicative of other issues though beyond just that. combat today has body armor reminiscent of crusaders. weighty bulletproof gear plus weighty arms and other equipment... it all adds up. so long as women are required to meet the same requirements as men this wouldn't be a problem...
but...
they are currently not held to the same standards
Americans learn only from catastrophe and not from experience. -- Theodore Roosevelt
My life has become a single, ongoing revelation that I haven’t been cynical enough.