Burkas for babies

[exploited]

So let me sum it up.

1. You have no evidence or inclination to prove that these statistics were the result of a global conspiracy to harm Muslims. So that isn't your argument.

2. You have no evidence that any of these polls were invalid. So that isn't your argument.

3. You have no evidence that the sample size was too small, whether the poll was taken in Yemen or Canada. So that isn't your argument.

4. You have no evidence that supports your view, which is that only a small minority of extremists exist, and every other Muslim is just a free man yearning to be free from bondage (even though an overwhelming majority of Muslims support Sharia Law). So that isn't your argument... Or is it?

For the last time, what is your point? Please spell it out for this dumb dumb. I don't know why you entered this thread at all, because it certainly wasn't to present a cogent argument based upon any sort of actual facts.

Why don't you just let emerald handle it? At least she is capable of making an actual argument instead of going dddddddurrrr you're wrong!!!111

[WizardfromOz]

[exploited]

[eynon81]

[WizardfromOz]

1997

(Sept)

87% Americans have read or heard about UFO’s

12% reported that they had something that they thought was a UFO

45% think UFO’s have visited earth

48% believe UFO’s are something real

31% believe UFO’s are the result of people’s imagination

72% believe that there is life in some form on other planets in the Universe

38% believe that there are people somewhat like ourselves living on other planets

71% believe that the US Government knows more about UFO’s than it’s telling

Screw the Muslims we have to watch out for the government and the alien invasion - It must be true - The opinion poll says so

[exploited]

So you think that 45 percent of Americans lied about believing in UFOs? You think that poll doesn't accurately reflect the views of Americans?

You have literally no point. Worst response ever lol.

[exploited]

These are valid statistical polls provided by reputable newspapers and polling agencies. Not from some guys blog.

Are Pew International, CBS News and The Toronto Sun no longer valid sources? If not, what is?

[exploited]

Polling is a long established science. Sorry, but you can't just discount them because they lead to uncomfortable conclusions.

[eynon81]

[exploited]

Is there anyone here actually willing to engage in debate based upon evidence and factual knowledge, or should both of those things be disregarded in favour of anecdotal evidence and vaguely defined 'indepth' worldviews derived from thin air?