Circumcision pluses outweigh risks

[Boris Johnson]

Who are these plenty of men?

Do they happen to reside in your mind?

[lil bit]

No, I met them on the other forum. Why?

[Clarino]

PP or ole PCF?

I don't recall this ever being discussed there.

[lil bit]

Both, really. The conversation was about breasts themselves.
I mentioned that my friend's husband didn't care she had no breasts and he was just glad she was still around.
The general consensus was he was definitely a minority and that most men would walk.

[Clarino]

That was a totally different situation from removing baby girl's breast buds though. This issue has never been raised before.

[Boris Johnson]

[Clarino]

She was referring to a friend. Who had had preventive mastectomies in adulthood. Nothing to do with this issue whatever.

[lil bit]

The principle is the same.

Both situations concern tissue removal that impacts on the sexual enjoyment of the person's partner.

Both times the tissue removal is carried out for health reasons.

The removal of breast bud tissue on baby girls is a hypothetical procedure I put forward to explain why I am entitled to have an opinion on circumcised penises.

[Clarino]

Nonsense. The two things are utterly separate, and one is not even a procedure which is practised. For any reason.

This is not an issue that has anything to do with the sexual satisfaction of others. Please stop derailing the thread with irrelevancies.

[jurupa]