Supreme Court Justices Reject Video Coverage, Again
46 posts
• Page 2 of 5 • 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Re: Supreme Court Justices Reject Video Coverage, Again
by exploited » Tue Feb 19, 2013 12:54 pm
To be fair, I'd be worried about getting capped for saying something that offends the wrong person. The Supreme Court already gets enough death threats; allowing people to see it's inner workings is only going to increase the number of threats, and consequently, the chances of someone following through with it.
That being said, transparency is still more important, given the low risk of such a threat actually coming to fruition.
That being said, transparency is still more important, given the low risk of such a threat actually coming to fruition.
-
exploited - Vice President
- Posts: 23035
- Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2012 2:32 pm
- Location: Ontario, Canada
- Gender:
- Has thanked: 2562 times
- Been thanked: 1837 times
Re: Supreme Court Justices Reject Video Coverage, Again
by eynon81 » Tue Feb 19, 2013 12:58 pm
- These users thanked the author eynon81 for the post:
- The Dharma Bum
-
eynon81 - VIP
- Posts: 19475
- Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 10:38 am
- Location: Golden, Colorado
- Gender:
- Has thanked: 3875 times
- Been thanked: 1821 times
- Political Leaning: Very Conservative
Re: Supreme Court Justices Reject Video Coverage, Again
by Kane » Tue Feb 19, 2013 1:01 pm
Last edited by Kane on Tue Feb 19, 2013 1:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
Kane - Vice President
- Posts: 10213
- Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2012 1:09 pm
- Location: The Yay
- Gender:
- Has thanked: 430 times
- Been thanked: 563 times
- Political Leaning: Rockefeller Republican
Re: Supreme Court Justices Reject Video Coverage, Again
by J.K. Gregg » Tue Feb 19, 2013 1:02 pm
What I would have paid/done to sit in on the Citizens United or Obamacare closed door deliberations.
Objectivist, IT professional, news junkie, geek, and husband. Formally known by Tetracide. I do the twitter @jk_gregg.
You're wrong until proven correct.
You're wrong until proven correct.
-
J.K. Gregg - Senator
- Posts: 1612
- Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2012 11:54 am
- Location: Northern California
- Gender:
- Has thanked: 79 times
- Been thanked: 114 times
- Political Leaning: Objectivist
Re: Supreme Court Justices Reject Video Coverage, Again
by Revenant » Tue Feb 19, 2013 1:40 pm
Good. The public can barely be trusted to digest their own food properly, let alone complex legal proceedings. Fair. Next.
-
Revenant - Senator
- Posts: 1019
- Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2012 1:19 pm
- Gender:
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 115 times
- Political Leaning: Conservative
46 posts
• Page 2 of 5 • 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 174 guests