by Dobby » Mon Mar 25, 2013 6:40 am
The issue I have with the 'discussion' argument is it assumes everyone thinks rationally in every situation. People don't act rationally in every situation. Imagine I'm in a really bad mood, no matter how great this idea that everyone has came up with, I'm just going to say no to it to spite everyone because I'm in a mood. Thus, this great idea fails because I'm being irrational. While I agree that discussion can produce some sort of consensus, I find it difficult to see it as 100% consensus. It also assumes that everyone wants what is best for society. Again using the example above, people don't always want what is best for society.