by exploited » Sat Apr 06, 2013 8:45 am
Being rich doesn't make you evil, or a villain. And people should be rewarded generously for their innovations. But in a world where ten million children starve to death every year, the concept of compensating people millions for inventing the pet rock, or allowing people to be billionaires merely by collecting rent, becomes clearly immoral.
This is especially the case since we, the taxpayer, are the ones that enable such success. We pay for infrastructure and police, we fund public education and research programs, we basically paid for all the biggest technological developments of the past half century, and yet the people who profit most from our investments consist of no more than 5% of the population. Coupled with the existence of extreme poverty, I just don't see how such wealth can be morally justified.
I personally think that almost no one truly deserves monetary wealth exceeding a hundred million a year. And not only that, but such wealth is actually bad for the economy... if monetary wealth past the line listed above was seized and redistributed equally among all citizens, it would kick off growth and productivity never seen before.