Judge To Mother: Stop Living With Girlfriend or Lose Custody

[John Galt]

[Spider]

This is naught to do with children's welfare, its BS morality crap that is being applied to an adult under the guise of children's welfare. People can hide anything behind "What about the children!!!"

Yes, she agreed to it. She could have also agreed to always wear a funny hat when its raining on a Wednesday, and I'd roll my eyes at that as well.

[John Galt]

[The Comrade]

i said this on the first page.

if this was some "Radical feminist" sticking it to a hetero dudebro galt would agree with you guys.

you aren't going to get anywhere arguing about how silly a coerced morality clause is.

[John Galt]

[The Dude]

[Aaron]

You're pissing into the wind on this one dudeski, if you want a favorable judicial result, you need to exist in a political climate favorable to that result. Texas would be the incorrect climate.

[Kane]

You'd figure a state known for greased up dudes drenched in oil they'd be more willing to let this slide...

[The Comrade]

[The Dharma Bum]

The divorce agreement is negotiated by the two people getting divorced's lawyers. If she didn't want a morality clause in the papers she should have told the lawyer to make sure there wasn't to be one.

Now it is part of their divorce agreement.

Case closed. She should let the father take the kids. They'd be back soon enough.