Orientations toward religion

[spacemonkey]

Yay or nay on God ? The one true fact is this, nobody knows. The cosmos is a pretty big place so they say. How big? No body knows that either. Could be every thought every human has ever had might be a reality somewhere in it, or maybe not. Another thing nobody knows. One Interesting note is this, our distant ancestors did see things, and did record them in their writings, artifacts, cave paintings, etc.What they actually seen is still up for debate to this day. What would we leave for future generations to tell about us? A batman comic, or relavant things?

[The Comrade]

[spacemonkey]

[The Comrade]

you tell me. i don't need to prove a negative.

[exploited]

[spacemonkey]

[spacemonkey]

[JDHURF]

[Stratego]

[JDHURF]

You are still not making sense. If A does not equal B there is clearly both a case, separately, where "it's not A" and also a case where "it's not B."[1] When you add "...but also B" to the case "where it's not A" what is that supposed to mean? Also B in addition to what? In assuming that either A or B are the only two available options, for the sake of your attempted demonstration, clearly it is either A or B and not both simultaneously. If it's not A then clearly it's B. If it's not B then clearly it's A. When it is not one of the two, it is clearly the other but not in addition to anything else, it is that proposition alone. So, again, it is meaningless when you mention the "case where it's not A, but also B..."

Is there a case where someone says "I believe there is(are) no god(s)" and not "I do not believe in god(s)"(not A but B)? Sure. Is there a case where someone says "I do not believe in god(s)" and not "I believe there is(are) no god(s)"(not B but A)? Absolutely.

You conclusion is a complete non sequitur and your premises are a mess themselves.

[1] You may have begun to go awry when you used "it's not A" to signify when it is B and vice versa. That lends more easily to confusion than to clarity.